Polymarket hack losses rose to $3.1M after 11 wallets were hit, while the platform pledged refunds and faces fresh CFTC scrutiny.Polymarket hack losses rose to $3.1M after 11 wallets were hit, while the platform pledged refunds and faces fresh CFTC scrutiny.

Polymarket hack losses rise to $3.1M as refund pledge faces scrutiny

2026/06/28 21:49
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Polymarket’s latest security incident has grown larger after blockchain intelligence firm AMLBot updated the estimated losses to about $3.1 million.

Summary
  • Polymarket’s frontend phishing attack now shows $3.1 million in losses across 11 user wallets.
  • The platform says a compromised third-party vendor injected malicious code into parts of its frontend.
  • The refund pledge comes as lawmakers press regulators over alleged deceptive prediction market advertising practices.

The prediction market platform had earlier promised to refund affected users after saying a third-party vendor compromise allowed malicious code to reach some users through its frontend.

Hack losses rise to $3.1M

AMLBot said hackers stole about $3.1 million in PUSD from 11 user wallets. The firm said the funds were taken from Polygon and quickly bridged to Ethereum.

The update raises the loss figure from earlier estimates near $2.94 million. Specter Analyst had first flagged the attack as a phishing campaign that drained funds from at least 11 wallets holding PUSD.

Polymarket said in a June 25 post that it found a third-party vendor had been compromised. The company said the vendor issue allowed attackers to inject a malicious script into the platform’s frontend for some users.

Frontend attack targeted user wallets

The attack appears to have targeted users through the website interface rather than the core protocol. That type of attack can trick users into approving harmful wallet activity while they believe they are using the normal platform.

PeckShield said the attacker bridged stolen funds from Polygon to Ethereum and swapped them into about 1,893 ETH. Specter also said the funds were consolidated into an Ethereum address after the phishing activity.

A frontend attack can be difficult for users to detect in real time. The site may look normal, but the code loaded in the browser can create unsafe wallet prompts.

The incident also puts focus on third-party dependencies. Even if a platform’s smart contracts remain unchanged, outside code used in a website can create risk for users who connect wallets.

Earlier incidents add pressure

The latest incident follows other Polymarket security issues. In March, blockchain investigator ZachXBT flagged a suspected breach after more than $520,000 was reportedly drained from two Polygon smart contracts.

Polymarket later said funds were safe in that case. In December, the platform also confirmed an incident on its Discord channel after users reported missing funds and suspicious login attempts.

A previous report said the latest attack was recorded by DefiLlama as the 89th crypto security breach of the second quarter. The same report said that count made the quarter the highest on record by number of reported incidents.

The growing incident count shows why platforms now face closer checks across smart contracts, wallets, login systems, frontend code and outside vendors.

Regulatory scrutiny widens

The hack also arrives as Polymarket faces new regulatory attention. A recent report said U.S. Senators Adam Schiff and John Curtis urged the CFTC to review allegations tied to deceptive advertising practices.

The senators asked whether Polymarket promoted markets through simulated trading websites, staged transactions and undisclosed paid influencer campaigns. They also questioned whether the CFTC has enough tools to oversee prediction markets and protect users.

Polymarket and Kalshi are also part of a wider legal fight over sports event contracts. Kentucky has accused prediction market firms of offering unlicensed sports betting, while the CFTC has argued that federally regulated event contracts fall under its authority.

As previously reported, the cases may help decide whether sports-linked prediction markets answer mainly to federal derivatives rules or state gambling laws.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52
Thinking of Buying Bittensor? Watch These TAO Price Correction Levels First

Thinking of Buying Bittensor? Watch These TAO Price Correction Levels First

Bittensor (TAO) is navigating a rough patch as broader market conditions turn shaky. TAO just took a hit along with the rest of the AI token crowd, but if you look
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/04/03 00:30
China Nabs Another Huione Group Core Member in Cambodia Extradition

China Nabs Another Huione Group Core Member in Cambodia Extradition

The post China Nabs Another Huione Group Core Member in Cambodia Extradition appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Li Xiong, a senior figure at Huione Group, an
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/04/02 17:54

Newbies:Deposit $100, Get $1,000

Newbies:Deposit $100, Get $1,000Newbies:Deposit $100, Get $1,000

Plus Up to a $50 Referral Bonus