Key TakeawaysStrategy (MSTR), the largest corporate Bitcoin holder, has not bought BTC in seven weeks and sold roughly 1,690 BTC worth about $108.6 million on August 10, its second disposal of 2026, lKey TakeawaysStrategy (MSTR), the largest corporate Bitcoin holder, has not bought BTC in seven weeks and sold roughly 1,690 BTC worth about $108.6 million on August 10, its second disposal of 2026, l

Strategy Stops Buying Bitcoin: Saylor's Never-Sell Era Ends as MSCI Threatens a $2.8 Billion Index Exit

Key Takeaways
Strategy (MSTR), the largest corporate Bitcoin holder, has not bought BTC in seven weeks and sold roughly 1,690 BTC worth about $108.6 million on August 10, its second disposal of 2026, leaving holdings near 840,447 BTC.
Michael Saylor has replaced the old never sell pledge with a framework in which Bitcoin sales help fund dividends on the company's preferred stock when issuing new equity is unattractive, supported by roughly $4.7 billion in cash reserves.
Index provider MSCI opened a consultation this month on rules to identify non operating companies. In its simulation on May 2026 data, Strategy, Metaplanet and uranium holder Yellow Cake would all be deleted from the flagship ACWI IMI benchmark.
JPMorgan previously estimated exclusion could trigger about $2.8 billion of passive selling in MSTR alone, with earlier analysis warning of up to $8.8 billion if other index providers follow. Feedback closes September 30, results are due around October 16, and changes could take effect at the November review.
Strategy fired back publicly, arguing index providers should measure markets rather than police corporate assets, writing "Bitcoin doesn't need MSCI. Neither does Strategy." Meanwhile Norway's sovereign wealth fund disclosed record indirect Bitcoin exposure, with Strategy making up 86% of it.
 
 

The Buyer of Last Resort Has Left the Market

For five years, the crypto market could count on one bid that never blinked. Strategy, the company formerly known as MicroStrategy, bought Bitcoin through every crash, funded by waves of convertible debt, equity sales and preferred stock. That era has quietly ended. The company has now gone seven consecutive weeks without a purchase, its longest pause in years, and on August 10 it sold roughly 1,690 BTC for about $108.6 million, following the $216 million disposal in July that first broke the never sell taboo. Holdings stand near 840,447 BTC, still around 4% of all Bitcoin that will ever exist, alongside roughly $4.7 billion in cash reserves.
Saylor's explanation is a new capital framework rather than a change of faith. With MSTR stock trading at a depressed multiple of its Bitcoin net asset value, issuing new shares to buy more BTC would dilute existing holders, so the company instead prioritizes servicing the dividends on its preferred stock, selling modest amounts of Bitcoin when that is the cheapest source of funds. Supporters read it as prudent balance sheet management that protects the core position. Critics hear the market's most famous perpetual bull describing conditions under which he is a seller, and note that a formalized selling program makes Strategy a two way presence in the market for the first time.
 

The MSCI Threat: Failing Five Tests Out of Five

The buying pause is only half the story. This month MSCI opened a consultation on new rules designed to identify what it calls non operating companies, firms whose balance sheets are dominated by financial assets rather than an operating business. The methodology first checks whether business assets exceed 50% of total assets; companies below that line are then assessed on five criteria covering operating expenses, cash generation and reliance on fair value swings, and must pass at least two to stay eligible. Applied to May 2026 data, MSCI's own simulation deletes Strategy, Japan's Metaplanet and London listed uranium vehicle Yellow Cake from the flagship ACWI IMI index, while Ethereum treasury firm SharpLink lands on a watchlist. Reports indicate Strategy fails all five tests on its 2025 financials.
The stakes are mechanical rather than rhetorical. Passive funds must hold what their benchmark holds, so deletion converts an eligibility rule into forced selling. JPMorgan previously estimated MSCI exclusion alone could drive about $2.8 billion of passive outflows from MSTR, and earlier analysis put the figure as high as $8.8 billion if other index providers align. The timeline is tight: feedback runs through September 30, results are expected around October 16, and adopted changes could be implemented at the November index review. MSCI has cautioned the outcome may be full, partial or no change, and this is its second attempt after a crypto specific proposal was shelved in January following industry backlash.
 
 

Saylor Fights Back, and an Awkward Counterpoint From Norway

Strategy's response, posted on August 14, was combative. The company argued that digital assets are legitimate corporate assets, that index providers should measure markets rather than decide which assets companies may own, and that the proposal puts MSCI out of step with regulators and its own customers, concluding "Bitcoin doesn't need MSCI. Neither does Strategy." MSTR shares still slipped about 2% in premarket trading on the news, and prediction markets, on thin volume, lean toward exclusion.
The irony is that institutional demand for Strategy as a Bitcoin proxy has never been higher. Norway's sovereign wealth fund, the world's largest, disclosed that its indirect Bitcoin exposure reached an all time high in its latest filings, with Strategy accounting for 86% of it, alongside a newly revealed stake of 6.15 million shares in Ethereum treasury firm BitMine worth about $82 million. The same filing season showed Morgan Stanley expanding its spot ETF positions. Institutions clearly want the exposure; the fight is over which wrapper the index rulebooks will bless.
 

What It Means for the Bitcoin Market

For BTC itself, the effects run through flows and psychology. Mechanically, a pause by a buyer who absorbed billions in supply removes support at the margin, and analysts partly blame it for Bitcoin's muted reaction to good macro news. Psychologically, the shift tests a core bull market narrative: corporate treasuries were sold to investors as one way demand. A November deletion would be a real stress event for that thesis, while a decision to spare existing constituents, or renewed buying from Strategy once its stock recovers, would flip the story just as fast. Either way, October 16 and the November review join the calendar of dates that can move Bitcoin.
 

What It Means for Traders on MEXC

MSTR trades on the Nasdaq, but every branch of this story prices into assets traders can access directly. The clearest is Bitcoin itself, where treasury flow headlines have repeatedly moved the BTC/USDT pair this year, and corporate treasury news also ripples through Ethereum (ETH) via firms like BitMine and SharpLink. Traders can set alerts around the September 30 and October 16 consultation dates, watch for any resumption of Strategy purchases as a sentiment signal, and manage event risk with MEXC Futures.
市場機遇
比特幣 圖標
比特幣實時價格 (BTC)
--
----
USD
比特幣 (BTC) 實時價格圖表

描述:幣圈脈動基於 AI 技術與公開信息,第一時間呈現最熱代幣趨勢。如果想了解更多專業解讀與深度分析,請訪問新手學院

本頁面分享的文章均源自公開平台,僅供參考。該內容不代表 MEXC 的立場或觀點。所有版權歸 OoJae 所有。如果您認為任何內容侵犯了第三方的權益,請聯絡 service@support.mexc.com 以便及時刪除。 MEXC 不保證任何內容的準確性、完整性或及時性,且不對基於所提供信息而採取的任何行動負責。本內容不構成財務、法律或其他專業建議,亦不應被解釋為 MEXC 的推薦或認可。如需專家見解和深入分析,請造訪 MEXC 學院

學習更多 比特幣 知識

查看更多
MEXC Alpha Trader 投研週報 | 通膨降溫遇上地緣僵局:BTC 6.4萬箱體難破——突破窗口何時開啟?

MEXC Alpha Trader 投研週報 | 通膨降溫遇上地緣僵局:BTC 6.4萬箱體難破——突破窗口何時開啟?

2026年8月第3週 統計週期:2026年8月12日 – 8月18日 數據截止:2026年8月18日 核心敘事 過去一週,加密市場在宏觀數據與地緣政治的雙重驅動下延續區間震盪。比特幣在62,000-65,000美元箱體內反覆拉鋸,截至8月18日報約64,246美元,始終未能形成有效突破。市場正陷入「有資金、沒趨勢」的困局。 通膨數據全面降溫,升息預期進一步走弱。8月12日,美國勞工統計局公布7月C
2026/08/20
比特幣價格展望接近 $72K: BTC 接下來能否挑戰 $75,000?

比特幣價格展望接近 $72K: BTC 接下來能否挑戰 $75,000?

比特幣飆升至 $72,000,已將市場關注點從長期盤整階段轉向一個新問題:BTC 接下來會怎樣? 突破 $71,000 的走勢結束了為期六週的區間,並清除了大量看跌槓桿倉位的集中分佈。 然而,突破並不自動意味著比特幣會繼續直接上行至 $75,000 或更高。 摘要 比特幣突破了自 7 月初以來一直限制價格的約 $62,000–$66,900 區間,並於 8 月 20 日觸及 $71,000–$72
2026/08/20
比特幣 做多 vs 做空:合約交易者如何在波動的行情中應對

比特幣 做多 vs 做空:合約交易者如何在波動的行情中應對

比特幣不需要上漲,每位合約交易員都能參與市場。 與現貨交易不同,合約允許交易員根據對價格上漲或下跌的預期來建立持倉。 這使得區分 比特幣做多 vs 做空 成為新合約用戶應該理解的首要概念之一。 摘要 比特幣做多持倉通常在 BTC 上漲時受益。 比特幣做空持倉通常在 BTC 下跌時受益。 當市場朝相反方向波動時,兩者都可能產生虧損,而槓桿會放大這些虧損。 8 月比特幣漲勢清楚證明了這一點:大幅上漲突
2026/08/20
查看更多